Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Nike Milton Keynes Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (558 votes).

1 to 10 of 84 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

The big picture 2010 (84 votes)
Overall score
 
59%
How many would do it again?
 
64%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
59%
PB potential
 
73%
Atmosphere
 
54%
Organisation
 
42%
Value
 
49%
Beginner-friendliness
 
65%
Or view by year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
0
All years
 

2010 race reviewed by: J Will
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

Date of review: April 19, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: Nobster
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

Date of review: March 23, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: Robert Davies 14
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Let down by some basic organisational deficiencies
In full: Baggage drop a disaster so had to avoid it. 10k start got in the way and no timing pens meant I lost time at the start. No food, but loads of people at the finish handing out leaflets was just not good. That said, Marshalling was great, mile-markers were good and parking was excellent.
Date of review: March 21, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: Kriszi Beres
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: My first Half Marathon, but definitely not the last one!
Date of review: March 20, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: yorkiebeever
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Some organisational issues. No goodie bag! Easy access both in and out of MK.
In full: Cheers for the medal but where was the bag of goodies? I did this race in 2007 and then there was a goodie bag and a t-shirt! I opted to leave my bag in the car after seeing the horrendous queue. Bad plan with 10K's starting only 10mins before, caught up with 10K's on a narrow stretch which was quite congested. On the positive side absolutely no issues getting to the race and leaving the race also able to keep warm in the Escape.
Date of review: March 10, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: andyp
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
20%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
20%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: I can tick it off to say i've done it.....
Date of review: March 10, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: TomA1987
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: My first race, I had a lift to and from, arrived with ease, left with ease, no baggage issues as it was locked in the car, great first time race for me thouroughly enjoyed it, will definately be back again!
Date of review: March 9, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: Marco Di Franco
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: I still like it
In full: Third year that I have run this and I still like it. Not sure why some reviews are so angry about not being "flat" - The notes said there was a hill, and I was expecting it and quite enjoyed it!
Plus - I drove away quickly (thankfully I left the bags in the car so no baggage problems like some other runners which must have been terrible) and I was heading south on the M1 within ten minutes of crossing the line.
I like the scenary - the lake, the villages,
I was good to be in the warm of the Xcape until just before the start.
Minus - No lucozade, I was expecting perhaps one halfway. The start seemed disorganised with the 10K being summoned over the tannoy to make their way to the front.
But I will be back next year, so long as they arrange for the glorious Spring sunshine we had.
Date of review: March 9, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: Nichs10
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Not a bad race - but could improve.
In full: This is the second time I've done this race following the 2008 one and this time the route had changed meaning a steeper climb on the final 1.5 mile stretch - which wasn't pleasant!

Wasn't much going on considering it was billed as a 'festival of running' - no real major support from NIKE and only getting a medal for the entry fee was pretty woeful. The start was also chaos as there were no timing pens or anything to separate the quicker and slower runners - took me ages to work my way through the crowds.
On the plus side, the marshalls were good, the water stations were stocked well and the weather was great. The course was partly scenic around the lakes too and I did end up with an unexpected PB which was good prep for the VLM.
Date of review: March 9, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2010 race reviewed by: Jon Greenhalgh
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A reasonable race, not much festival feel and some organisational problems but has poal
In full: All the previous comments agreed. Need to start the 10 much earlier. No goody bag!
Date of review: March 9, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013