Cleethorpes New Year's Day 10kHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (43 votes). | 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2005 (4 votes) | | Overall score | | 70% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 55% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 65% | | Value | | 75% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 65% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tony Parry
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: finish was not great but considering it had to be changed due to building work with 4 days notice not bad. Date of review: January 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: banjo
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 3 x 90 degree turns in last 200 metres spoilt the finish, but otherwise an enjoyable race In full: Good PB potential if it's not too windy. Good organisation, but the finish was poor with 3 x 90 degree turns in the last 200 metres to spoil any chance of a sprint. Date of review: January 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jean Bagworth 3
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: need to close more roads were posable In full: Car fumes were bad i do not sufer with breething problems but was afected by them anyway. Date of review: January 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well organised. Good race to start the year off. Audible briefing at the start for once. Date of review: January 1, 2005
|

|