Barretts Canterbury 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (155 votes). | 1 to 10 of 20 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2005 (20 votes) | | Overall score | | 74% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 77% | | PB potential | | 61% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 71% | | Value | | 67% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 62% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: K !
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised and scenic race. Best 10 miler in Kent. Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: yeoman
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: bad starting procedure, two so so hills, nice course, chinese torture showers... enough said! Date of review: February 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: jacca
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: challengig couple of hills made worth it by the scenery In full: lovely run for the scenery - found the hills a challenge, but not too big a problem. Best bit was the oranges and bananas at the end - what a nice touch. And , oh yes, the radox bubble bath - thank you!!! Date of review: February 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: SeaLark
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough inclines offset by generous declines In full: Start was a bit haphazard, I was only in the sub 70 mins section but could not hear the starter. Otherwise a well organised event with a good test of a course Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Longlegs
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Nasty hills, dodgy false starts Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Prof
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Improved course this year, faster, well supported, good organisation. Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ICRAM
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good course. Need to sort the start procedure out and a baggage collection point would be useful. Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by:
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: the way all races should be - good facilities, well organised, undulating course with a couple of challenges! Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Paolini
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Quite quick, despite a couple of challenging hills In full: Managed to avoid the congestion at the start, although could see it would be a problem for those further back. Otherwise, a good, friendly event. The course is deceptively quick as, despite the two quite steep uphill climbs, the downhill stretches are longer so you can build up a bit of speed. Quite nice scenery, and very helpful marshals. Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Philip Barnes
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: My first race so difficult to compare but I will definitly return to improve my time! Date of review: January 31, 2005
|

| |