Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Arundel Castle 10k

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (90 votes).

1 to 10 of 16 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2006 (16 votes)
Overall score
 
89%
How many would do it again?
 
91%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
92%
PB potential
 
46%
Atmosphere
 
78%
Organisation
 
71%
Value
 
86%
Beginner-friendliness
 
72%
Or view by year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2006 race reviewed by: Daniel Cloke
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Great location and scenery, and friendly organisation and crowds at the finish. Long slow climb to start with followed by a downhill and a further shorter climb at 7k.
Date of review: September 4, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Glen Keegan
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great scenery, hard race
In full: Fantastic route through the grounds of Arundel Castle. The first 5.5k virtually all uphill so not good for PB but a great work out
Date of review: August 31, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Nichola Jones
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Great race, need to practise hill climbs before though!!!!
In full: Not PB potential but a great race. Great atmosphere and scenery. The beginning and the end of the race goes through Arundel Castle which is worth doing in itself. About the first 5k is on a tarmac incline through Arundel Park to which you then have to run down Target Valley. There is another 0.5k incline. The finish this year ended going down the high street instead of up which I found was quite narrow. Glad there were more water stations this year as it gets quite hot running uphills! All in all a good race and look forward to doing it next year. ;-)
Date of review: August 30, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Cicero
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: The hills are alive with the sound of ... people running up hills and down hills, rather steep ones, and then back up another smaller but just as steep one and ... finally finishing. [Julie Andrews is my mum.]
Date of review: August 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Mishkadog
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Lovely setting, just don't under estimate the climb
In full: Really beautiful setting, well organised. Because of the steady climb for the first half of the race it is really difficult to pace yourself, and just when you thought it would start to get easier at the top, the path becomes uneven, then when you are getting used to the uneven track and heading downwards they throw in another punishing climb which just about finished me off!
Nice atmosphere and a great crowd cheering you on at the end. Might take me a bit longer to convince myself I enjoyed it and to try again next year
Date of review: August 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: E :-)
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: The scenery more than makes up for that long slog up to 5km!
In full: Must admit that my ankles and calves were screaming on Monday from the grassy downhill - but beautiful and had fun at the Arundel Festival afterwards. Fantastic BBQ Sausages afterwards!
Date of review: August 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: alfred powell
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: prefer finishing up the hill instead of down the hill
Date of review: August 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Swede
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Terrific as usual
Date of review: August 29, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Fullstretchlimo
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Hard work but well worth it
In full: My first time doing this run and I really enjoyed it. It was hard work partly because it was hotter than I had expected and I had worn the wrong clothing. The last upward hill was a killer for me, next year I will pace myself better. View at the top was fantastic, I wished I'd had time to stop and take it in a bit longer.
Date of review: August 28, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Bob !
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Hard Hilly Race - 421 ft climb, only 342 ft back down!
In full: Hard 5.5k up, but well worth it for the views ( not that there was time to stop & look!). That hill at 7.5 to 8k was the worse, I nearly walked, many did! Great momento, makes a change from a medal. The festival in the Town meant that we stayed around a bit afterwards. Bought some lovely bread & Onion Marmalade & sat in Swanbourne lake for a picnic afterwards.
Only one minor gripe. Why did all the water stations seem to be just as a downhill section started! Have them on the uphill I prefer to run downhill!
Date of review: August 28, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013