Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Rainforest Foundation 10K

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (111 votes).

1 to 10 of 35 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  

The big picture 2004 (35 votes)
Overall score
 
77%
How many would do it again?
 
90%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
70%
PB potential
 
87%
Atmosphere
 
69%
Organisation
 
62%
Value
 
82%
Beginner-friendliness
 
82%
Or view by year
2009
2008
2007
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: JO Boy
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Really enjoyed the race , nice atmosphere , nice goody bag
Date of review: March 21, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: rachey
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: my pb of year
Date of review: December 22, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Robert Daly
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Top tastic
Date of review: December 16, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Michael Turner 5
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Very good atmosphere, will definately do it again.
Date of review: December 16, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Canadian Gooner
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Great friendly atmosphere and scored a PB!
Date of review: December 16, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: dftintin
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Quick, flat, heaps of competitors, "local" atmosphere, great baggage facilities, and very good bag of goodies
Date of review: November 26, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: JFL
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Well organised, fun and fast... was it really 10k? Did a pb.
Date of review: November 26, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Tina Huish
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Not the best but a quick race on a flat surface
In full: There was a delayed start with no explanation which was a bit frustrating. There were not enough toilet facilities. The timing and positioning at the end of the race was all over the place and not accurately recorded. The water stations were pretty poorly organised.
Date of review: November 16, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Matthew Broadway
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: welcoming, friendly, well organised and fast!
In full: P.B for me! Shame full results still not available on website. The system of recording finishers numbers/time manually at the end was also slow and very far from accurate. This made for a confused end to an otherwise good fast race.
Date of review: November 11, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Stephen Sampson
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Shame about the lack of loos and therefore a delayed start
Date of review: November 11, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  3  4  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013