Events

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Good cause but needs better organisation
In full: They ran out of water mid way through the race which was badly organised.

This was the 2006 race but the option will not let me choose this year
Date of review: November 1, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Good London 10k
In full: If you're going to give out a doggy bag, put something in it- a crunchy bar and a couple of leaflets isnt worth the hassle. TAUT drink is OK, but cant seem to buy it anywhere.
Date of review: October 10, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Well run, no fuss event.
In full: Organisers have learned from last year; well done; see you next year.
Date of review: October 6, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: nice crowd, good cause, well organised
Date of review: October 4, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Flat and fast - 3 laps - a bit boring!
Date of review: October 4, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: 3 laps of flat, fast, wide paths with beautiful park surrounds
In full: I had a great time, and took a minute from my PB. I was wrong to worry that the thousands of runners would be a blockage on the second and third laps: The wide lanes and friendly folk meant I was hardly slowed, though any sub-40 runner would encounter the pack for about the last 4km. Personally, I thought the large flourescent signs marking each kilometre were visible enough, though if they were mounted higher up they would be seen from within the pack. I would recommend this event for anyone of any ability.
Date of review: October 3, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Wide lanes, nice park, only 3 laps. Good fun!
Date of review: October 3, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Woo-hoo, look at me go!
In full: Flat and fast as you like and I knocked 2.30 off my PB.
Date of review: October 3, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		40%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: fine for amareurs, boring route
In full: It is an OK run for non experieced runners, organisation is fine. However the route is quite boring as it laps the park 3 times. Also the KMS are not well signaled which makes it difficul to set a pace some times.
Date of review: October 2, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator