46th Hogs Back 8Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (203 votes). | 1 to 10 of 25 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2005 (25 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 78% | | PB potential | | 52% | | Atmosphere | | 65% | | Organisation | | 74% | | Value | | 74% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 63% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: caroline21
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: i love this race but its always another good race day In full: I have run this race, but its also the same day as Tadley x country. I have been running 8 years and that was my first race. I never miss the water filled ditches or the soup afterwards. I wish the days could be different. They are both such great races, but Tadley is closer Date of review: October 26, 2007
|
2005 race reviewed by: James Stevenson 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good atmosphere, well organised - hill not too dificult! Date of review: December 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Paddy Clark
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: See below In full: Personally disastrous -- took me nearly as long for the 8 as when it was an 11-miler twenty years ago -- but it's a great race with great traditions. Used to be one of the premier road races in the country, and it would be nice to see it get back to that position. There was hot tea, by the way, in the single-storey building to the right of the finish -- but they were Losely House prices rather than athletic club ones. Date of review: December 17, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: lowregister
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A killer with charm Date of review: December 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nikki Patience
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A crisp , cold morning but worth getting out of bed for, very enjoyable! Date of review: December 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Neil Newman 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: newcomer, but really enjoyed and nowhere nearas bad as I had feared In full: Haven't got a lot to compare it to -longest race to date but really satisfying. Position wasn't as good as I wanted but nor as bad as I expected! One more step on the long path of training for the FLM. Date of review: December 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Goonerboy71
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: well organised, good but hard course, enjoyable. In full: But a very cold day, some of it icy but that's no one's fault! Could have done with hot drinks being available at the finish as it was a long walk back to the car... Date of review: December 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Rod Bisset
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very tactical as it starts with a 4 mile climb to the 1st water station In full: This event requires thought before starting, do you nail the 4 mile climb or hold something back for the remaining 50% of the course as by mile 5 you are on the flat. Plenty of people are there showing the way but the traffic on the high section is a factor. 2005 was so foggy that I am surprised one of the runners not wearing hi-viz vests weren't hit. I continue to be amazed by how long the drive into loseley House actually is, "Are we there yet Dad?"! Date of review: December 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: James Hatch
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very friendly and the romantic mist compensated for the sub-zero temperature Date of review: December 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Karl Elliott 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Enjoyable race, but on a cold December morning, a little treacherous underfoot in places. In full: I would have to question the 9.30 start time. Trying to run both up and downhill was more like Bambi on ice in palces!. How nobody fell on the main downhill stretch is a mircale. I think it would be far more sensible to puch the start time back and allow it to defrost a bit. Also, it's an incredibly long walk back from the finish to the car park. As scenic as the finish is, it's a long way on a cold day. Date of review: December 12, 2005
|

| |