Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Leatherhead Fire Station 10k Race

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (173 votes).

1 to 10 of 11 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2004 (11 votes)
Overall score
 
91%
How many would do it again?
 
100%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
91%
PB potential
 
64%
Atmosphere
 
76%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
85%
Beginner-friendliness
 
78%
Or view by year
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: Fishface
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Best 10K of the year - v.scenic and friendly race
In full: Everything is right about this race. v Scenic - the zig zag path as you come out of the trees is awesome. Couple of hills but not too bad - ran it with two first timers and both are now converted to running.
Very Well organised - and good to see on race notes for 2005 that the only minor points of toilets and parking are being addressed.
Date of review: September 13, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Chris Bale 2
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Great race, great scenery, good atmosphere. Thanks to Leatherhead Fire Station for organising it.
Date of review: November 18, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Nicky Donbavand
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great race - hills added to a positive race experience
Date of review: November 18, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Obee
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Fantastic location for a run - but those two hills took their toll!
Date of review: November 18, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: nick mcnamara
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: great race 2 steep hills but still managed a pb,
Date of review: November 15, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Hayden Nothnagel
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Challenging at first, great scenery.
Date of review: November 15, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Dr Robert
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: In glorious weather it was glorious!
Date of review: November 15, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Claire Goodram
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: very friendly atmosphere and all for a great cause!
Date of review: November 14, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Janine Collins 2
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great route and very well organised. Nice flat second half - thankfully!
Date of review: November 14, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Virginia Catmur
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Glorious
Date of review: November 14, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Runners Need
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013