Leatherhead Fire Station 10k RaceHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (173 votes). | 1 to 10 of 27 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2009 (27 votes) | | Overall score | | 92% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 83% | | PB potential | | 70% | | Atmosphere | | 81% | | Organisation | | 86% | | Value | | 76% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 75% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: On The Rails
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: MUST DO RACE
In full: My local race so bias towards this event. On the day the weather was perfect for distance running. If you don't run a negative split, then you have gone off too fast at the start. first 4k all up hill then 2k of downhill with the last 4k following the Mole Valley back to Leatherhead. Very much a race for club runners, but all are made very welcome. Very scenic race.
Date of review: November 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Hilts_UK
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Mix of road and light trail. Long hills at the start with some fast decents. Start delayed due by 15 mins due to toilet queues. Good atmosphere and decent crowd. Mixed field, lots of club runners but also a number of first timers. Back next year.
Date of review: November 22, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Amanda Rencontre
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great marshelling and once away from the roads great scenery
In full: Great fun - will be back!
Date of review: November 17, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Rick Gonzalez
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellent race, well worth running in.
In full: All aspects of this event were excellent. My thanks to all who took part in both running and organising this race. The race route itself was particularly good.
Date of review: November 16, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: MB3
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race, excellent course, brilliantly organised and very friendly.
In full: I've done this race for the last 3 years and love it. I seem to get quicker & quicker everytime and am surprised at how fast it is despite the tough first 4k. Great organisation, very friendly and nice atmosphere. Only slightly complaint is that the medal isn't great. Would it cost much more to do t-shirts?
Date of review: November 10, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mackem
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Friendly & well organised but tough on the hills - no pb course!
In full: Really tough hills which I wasn't really prepared for. The first 2.5K is a steady uphill climb with some quite challenging steep bits. There are at least 2 more climbs interspersed with a couple of long fast decents. My shins and knees were crocked afterwards and I've been laid up with ice packs ever since! A well organised and scenic race though with a friendly but pleasantly competitive atmosphere. I'd do it again, but would probably not hammer up the hills as much
Date of review: November 10, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Claire Morris
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The best post race cakes I've had, makes the hills worth while!
Date of review: November 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Craig Birch 3
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First 10k race in 8 years. Would definitely do again.
Date of review: November 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Harry Turnbull
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hilly but quick - great race.
Date of review: November 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: neil jennings 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Hilly at the start, but worth it for the downhill.
Date of review: November 9, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
