Gallovidian Dumfries 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (24 votes). | 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2006 (3 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 67% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 87% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 87% | | Value | | 87% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 73% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Nimble Runner
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Not much feedback is there! In full: Steve, Considering my comments, and the lack of feedback you race has recieved, you might wish to reconsider 'the friendliness' of your event. IF it was any good (and the pipers do were very nice) then many more peopl would offer great feedback, and join you again nect year. Whilst this year was a record entry.. i suggest it appeals more to a clubby runner, than an individual.
Steve
Date of review: September 12, 2007
|
2006 race reviewed by: Steve Head
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A lot of hard work by friends and club members paid off yet again Date of review: November 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: COLIN TOOLE
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: WE WILL BE BACK . In full: We came up from Manchester to take part in the race, we were overwhelmed by the reception we received, Thanks Mr Steve Head. The pipers at the start & end were what running in Scotland is all about,Very well done to all who arranged and took part. Once again , THANK YOU. Date of review: September 7, 2006
|

| |