Grunty Fen Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (97 votes). | 1 to 10 of 16 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2004 (16 votes) | | Overall score | | 81% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 61% | | PB potential | | 84% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 79% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Snuffles
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: pb potential if not windy and hot - which it was.
Date of review: September 22, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Steve Palmer 1
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good race. windy but got a pb!
Date of review: September 19, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: honorary welshman
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Gale force winds, hot sunshine and only water available to drink made this a bad day for me. My slowest time ever.
Date of review: September 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Nigel Baker 3
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: As flat a course as you could hope for, but featureless and exposed. Very well organised.
Date of review: September 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: peter robinson 3
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Weather conditions play a big factor - this could be a bitch if the wind was howling off the fens.
Date of review: September 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: "Underwear"
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Friendly and flat, but beware if the wind gets up!
Date of review: September 16, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Kay Trinder
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Wind blew me to a virtual standstill!
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: welshweasel
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I had a great time. The whole event went smoothly and was great fun.
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Eco-freako
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat course, friendly people, easy getting in and away
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Laurence Calver
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent organisation and facilities
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
