In short: Enjoyable as always In full: I agree that the km markers seemed a bit all over the place this year. OK up until 5km, then 6,7 and 8 went a bit screwy, with 9 seeming to be about right. Still good though, and still going back next year. Date of review: October 11, 2004
In short: A bit ondulating, off-road but nice trails and path on grass ish surface. In full: The only issue is the fact that the km markers are not very accurate, especially the km 6 this year! Date of review: October 11, 2004
In short: Great scenery. Well organised. A bit of a squash in paces. In full: There were several points during the first 2k that gave rise to 'bottleneck', but the route made up for that.
Well organised. The man on the 'mike' was very good, very encouraging.
My only criticism was that the results were not pinned up, and do not seem to be available on a web site. You could pay 50p to have them sent through, but I'd left my change in the car - 600m away. (And after a 10k, I wasn't about to jog there and back for 50p!)
Apart from that, very good, and for a very worthwhile cause (Sue Ryder) and I would do it again. Date of review: October 11, 2004