Forest of Dean Trails Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (240 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2004 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 82% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 92% | | PB potential | | 52% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 72% | | Value | | 75% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Harry Rose
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough and well worth a go
Date of review: January 22, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mr Phil [now a fully paid up member of the sub 20 club!]
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really good race, despite torrential rain, the marshall support was excellent. Didn't feel as if it was uphill for 9 miles!
Date of review: November 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: NiftyAMP
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice race,would be better to hold it late April,when the blue bells are out.
In full: Shame about the rain in 2004.Would be better slightly later in the year.Late April/early may to catch the blue bells and Lambs as you jog along.
Date of review: November 9, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: returning runner
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: .
Date of review: November 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Sol
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Despite always being slow - one of my favourite Halfs to start my running year with.
Date of review: September 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Dragon Breath
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I loved this race, even though it was cold, wet and windy. A hard course but what do you expect in a forest in March when there's snow on the ground.
Date of review: September 6, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mike Sas
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Tough - organisers pulled the often used trick of 'ironing' the course - was described as F/U, I would call it a H (H/U at best). I expect it would would be a glorious course to run on a nice day!
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Steve J
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
