The Terminator 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (326 votes). | 1 to 10 of 31 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture 2006 (31 votes) | | Overall score | | 93% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 92% | | PB potential | | 35% | | Atmosphere | | 88% | | Organisation | | 90% | | Value | | 85% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 63% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: ooh my knees hurt!
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I survived!
In full: Half way round I thought 'what the f****** h*** am I doing this for? When I could be in a nice warm bed!' I was vowing never ever to be so stupid again as to do this race. But then I managed to finish! I'll be back, enjoyed the day, friendly marshalls, although they did tell one or two lies (you know who you are!). Thank you Pewsey.
Date of review: March 7, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Richy Fingers
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I'll be back - in 2007
In full: My first 'terminator' but definately not my last. Thoroughly enjoyed myself. Lots of friendly marshalls. I have 2 suggestions - More toilets and one or two mile markers. Then it would be perfect!
Date of review: March 6, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: ShufflingB
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Cracking fun - well marshalled, wet and muddy ... bit hilly in places :-)
In full: As you'll have probably gathered elsewhere there were some fairly steep ascents involved in this one. However, once you reached the top there were some absolutley cracking ridge runs and downhills, which after the climb up felt like you were flying. Should also mention that the gradients were so steep there was no shame in walking (or staggering) to the top, as pretty much everyone did, so I reckon it'd be as suitable for beginners as anything else.
Date of review: March 5, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: John Miller 6
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Brilliant race, extremely hard but very rewarding . Marshalling was very good, I have never seen so many people involved on sucha cold day. Very friendly. The only drawback was the hold-ups especially whith the two stys on top of one of the hills.
Date of review: March 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: retro
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very well organized
In full: Superb race the 3 hills are unrunable for most.very well marshalled you have to start quick to avoid being held up though.i'll be back
Date of review: March 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Jonathan Newell 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: 3 or 4 horrible hills! Great fun definitely coming back next year
Date of review: March 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Peter Moss
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Great organisation and marshalls,more an event than a race.
In full: Lots of hills,mud and water.it can be difficult on some sections to get through as the space is limited to single track.Very tough course for off roaders only i would say.Would not do it again unless i was made too!
Date of review: March 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Colin Roulstone
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: hard but great fun
Date of review: March 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: chalky...
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A cheerful wander around the hills and towpaths of Wiltshire ...
Date of review: March 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: black rat
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Windy, hilly and muddy but exelent fun definately a must for next year
In full: This is the 2nd time of doing this run and this year was even better. Hills steep, windy and cold and lots of mud. Very well organised, friendly marshalls. Only complaint was queing for the stile which took 5 minutes and by then I had started to get cold. Otherwise exelent and will be back next year.
Date of review: February 28, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
