Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Guy Fawkes 10

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (243 votes).

1 to 10 of 12 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2004 (12 votes)
Overall score
 
87%
How many would do it again?
 
92%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
95%
PB potential
 
42%
Atmosphere
 
68%
Organisation
 
73%
Value
 
78%
Beginner-friendliness
 
63%
Or view by year
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: Kriszti
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Good atmosphere
Date of review: December 16, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Victor Lendzionowski
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great run, great scenery, well organised
Date of review: November 18, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: wizzwazz1
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: very good race
Date of review: November 13, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: just one more mile
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: class
Date of review: November 13, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Brinkeley
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Hills, glorious hills. And Yorkshire tea-bags.
Date of review: November 10, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Vikingdoc
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: part trail part country track hills and beautiful scenery
Date of review: November 10, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: simes
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great Race, Great Organisation
Date of review: November 8, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: NorthernExile
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Some of those hills are killers! Did I see grown men crying??
Date of review: November 8, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: JohnnyBike
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: The hills win out here, very tough race but great scenery
In full: I enjoyed the race but did not realise how hard it would be.
Looking for sub 70 and ended up at nearly 73 minutes.
Well organised, nice t-shirt. Couple of mile markers missing and minimal water at the end.
But I did enjoy the race!!
Date of review: November 8, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Jonathan Yates
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: hills have the upper hand
In full: There could have been more obvious mile markers as the first anyone saw was mile 3.

Hills , 5 of the - very hard running

Brillinat
Date of review: November 7, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
ah... achilles heel
Runners Need
Millet Sports
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013