Experian Robin Hood MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (876 votes). | The big picture 2005 (118 votes) | | Overall score | | 86% | | How many would do it again? | | 93% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 64% | | PB potential | | 67% | | Atmosphere | | 78% | | Organisation | | 88% | | Value | | 70% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: JAC1ARK
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very popular, well supported all around the course, few hills but nothing too bad - always a fun event Date of review: May 22, 2007
|
2005 race reviewed by: Andrew Tyers
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great entry to the half marathon. Looking forward to running it again. Date of review: September 7, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: oldmanburns
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Hard to fault In full: A really well organised and cheerful race.Catered to all types.Was nowhere near fit enough for 1/2 marathon but the atmosphere carried me round!Definately do it again. Date of review: April 15, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Motty
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very Enjoyable, Well Supported Race Date of review: February 17, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Heston Groenewald
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great location & good fast course. Date of review: February 17, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: gordy 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good half with lots of support but expensive In full: A relatively easy course. As others have said the start is a bit narrow in places and beginners starting to far forward and then walking after half a mile. Very expensive and no t-shirt but good medal. Goody bag hardly worth the effort to carry, more leaflets advertising products than anything useful. Will do it again as its my local run and there is always lots of vocal support all th way round (half anyway) Date of review: February 3, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: muddy
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: there are other races i'd rather do In full: usual complaint i guess is that there are too many people. But it gets the supporters out. The route could be mroe exciting some of the bits through suburbs and stuff is better than GNR but not great Date of review: January 13, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Poppy-Power
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A well organised race with clear parking arrangements (if you turn up early enough) or good bus links from train and bus station etc. Nice big field for first half - extremely well marshalled. Second half flat, fast but less supported by spectators. Date of review: January 12, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: WiggyB
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyed this more than the Great North Run - much easier with the start & finish being in the same place. Date of review: December 5, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Dado
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: For every up there is a down (hill) Great support all round the course and less crowded than Great North. Date of review: September 27, 2005
|

| |