Lordshill 10kHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (64 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2005 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 75% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 68% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 85% | | Value | | 82% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 69% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Terence Earney
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very enjoyable race
Date of review: June 29, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: simon Eggington
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: quick course but beware of the hill at 9km.good event
Date of review: June 29, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Empty
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really well organised event, friendly helpful marshalls.
In full: If anything the enforced change in course made the course better, despite the extra hill !! Weather was again good. Will be back next year.
Date of review: June 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Blackers
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very friendly local feel - if you're a local club member, you'll see everyone you know!
In full: A very friendly race that is exceedingly well marshalled and policed. Can't put my finger on it, but there is a really local atmosphere to this race even though there's a significant number of fast runners up the sharp end.
Date of review: June 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: chunky.
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: One of my favourite races, villagey feel, well organised, freindly marshals
In full: This was my first 10k 2 years ago, and it's been special ever since
Date of review: June 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Hendo.
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A varied and interesting course
In full: Some form of countdown for the gun about to go would have been nice!
Date of review: June 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nick Luxton
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent marshalling, bit too narrow through the trail section
Date of review: June 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ChristchurchJon
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Superb organisation
In full: The enforced route change means it isn't as flat as it used to be, but a superbly marshalled course and the results were available quicker than at any other race I've been to.
Date of review: June 26, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
