Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Garden City 10

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (94 votes).

1 to 10 of 16 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2004 (16 votes)
Overall score
 
70%
How many would do it again?
 
88%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
45%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
59%
Organisation
 
76%
Value
 
70%
Beginner-friendliness
 
66%
Or view by year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: McBuzzers
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Everything you need apart from the scenary
Date of review: December 16, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Mike Allibone
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Flat two lap course around the streets and pathways of WGC - good training run for a 1/2 marathon? Probably should rate the course as pure speed, winner smashed course record this year, 49 mins and ?? secs.
Date of review: September 14, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Jo 90
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: The 2 lap course means you endure the boring views of houses and industrial estates twice over. But the mostly flat course is good for first timers and PB's.
Date of review: September 9, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Simon boast
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Well organised, well marshalled.
Date of review: September 8, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Lummox
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Fellow runners and stewards (except the one at 6 miles that refused a second cup of water) were helpful & friendly.
Date of review: September 8, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: JM.
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Ok run if you don't mind running on narrow pavements.
Date of review: September 7, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: JimC
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: nice well organised local run, the heat made it more of a challenge, but it was only 10 miles.
Date of review: September 7, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Lindsey Bain
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Not enough water stations considering how hot it was
Date of review: September 7, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Save Ferris
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: hot day and an ordinary route
Date of review: September 7, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: S3oB
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Excellent organisation both before and after the race. Only 2 issues - dangerous tree roots making the pavements uneven (saw at least 1 faller) and no T-shirts as advertised
Date of review: September 7, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
ah... achilles heel
Millet Sports
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013