Great Cumbrian Run Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (322 votes). | 1 to 10 of 50 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
| The big picture 2009 (50 votes) | | Overall score | | 82% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 74% | | PB potential | | 64% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 76% | | Value | | 73% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 75% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Heidi_Martin
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: My first ever half-marathon achieving 2hrs 33mins which I'm more than happy with. Good for beginners In full: As I did not know the course I paced myself so as not to wear myself out but upon finishing I realised I could have pushed myself harder and achieved 2 hours. Definately do it again. Date of review: December 3, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: ChristineH
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A couple of hills at the beginning but a breeze after that - would suit a beginner - loved it, would run again definitely! Date of review: November 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Steve Head
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Congested start and a lot of hanging around before the start due to having to collect running chip at least an hour before the start. In full: Allow an extra £5 for Car parking at this event, no concession is made for competitors Date of review: November 5, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Sara Stewart 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyable, generally seemed to run like clockwork. Date of review: November 4, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Lydia Plackett 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race good atmosphere well organised love it Date of review: November 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: mandy evill
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good posative first time race In full: Nothing to bench mark this with so despite weather an all round posative a experience, first race for me, hasnt put me off and learnt much. The only enhancement I would say is, I know we live in a mans world but ladies T shirts would have be very welcome.......do all ladies T-shirts next year and see how the men react lol!!! Date of review: October 31, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Tina K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great run In full: I really enjoyed this race, despite the poor weather at the start. Would do it again. Nice to make a weekend of it. Date of review: October 30, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ken Kyle
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Despite the weather, a grand day, well organised Date of review: October 30, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: JPAtko
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Undulating city centre and rural course, good atmosphere In full: Well supported event, despite the pretty nasty wet/windy weather. Course undulates (my garmin said almost 1000feet climbing) but no slope too tough, although 1 short/sharp rise late on out of the park (11.5miles) Route was well marshalled, no problems there and plenty of water available (although as someone mentioned, positioned near bottom of hills when hard to drink when your lungs are doing overtime climbing!!) A concern was having to collect timing chips over an hour before the race, parking not cheap (add extra hour for the chip), and having travelled over 100miles to compete, would have been uncomfortably early start had the clocks not moved that weekend. I enjoyed the courses challenges and managed a PB, although I was hoping to go a little faster. Not sure it's a genuine PB course, as I hadn't done a half for 8 months and have got a little faster. The start inside the castle was a nice touch (if not a little cramped for the 1st few minutes - big event with slower runners starting a little far forward) Also enjoyed the running track finish, very smooth, pity the whole course couldn't be so bouncy, haha. Would I do the event again? Maybe? If it was closer I probably would, but not sure about travelling so far for this half marathon. Then again I may just be back for another go next year, have to wait and see. Date of review: October 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: stephen howarth
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: it would have been better is the weather had been good Date of review: October 28, 2009
|

| |