Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Cirencester 10K

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (85 votes).

1 to 8 of 8 ratingsPage: 1

The big picture 2004 (8 votes)
Overall score
 
70%
How many would do it again?
 
88%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
85%
PB potential
 
62%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
48%
Value
 
62%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%
Or view by year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: LoopyLor
Overall score
 
20%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
20%
Value
 
20%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: Awful Race would never do this again.
In full: I ran this in 65 minutes by which time they had run out of water and goody bags etc at the finish, was punishing to us beginners. Would definitely not do this race again.
Date of review: April 17, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: P Nadolski
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: As a first race for me, it was great. Great course - found the hills 'challenging' - and nice friendly atmosphere. Water station would have helped.
Date of review: October 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: B1rchy
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Quite fast course, the hills are not as big as expected!!
Date of review: October 1, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: The_Dodger
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Not bad...the hill that you do twice is a bit overrated.
In full: The scenary was nice, the course wasn't too tough and there were plenty of runners of all types. The drwabacks were...1) no water stops which appeared to be tough on a number of newer runners 2) the distance from parking to the course and 3) the number of toilet facilities.
Date of review: September 29, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Run Your Age
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Thoroughly enjoyable ;¬) with a moderate hill. Organisation could improve.
In full: PB for me - with the satisfaction of a moderately challenging course. Good for improving runners.
Organisation could improve - drinks station would be good, and there's a bottleneck on the way to the start. It's a kissing gate which only lets 1 person through at a time, a severe nuisance for supporters with pushchairs. Although I think it may have been Longstocking and Flash in the Pan lingering at the gate which contributed to the delay . . .
Date of review: September 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Rob James
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A lovely run in the Park
Date of review: September 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: SGQ
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Nice scenery and traffic free. Doing the hill twice hurts. Needs a drink station somewhere on the route.
In full: I enjoyed this race, except for the hill which was quite painful on both occasions. It's a lovely park to run through and great to face very little traffic. I was gasping for a drink, but no drinks station - with it being two loops, they'd only need one to keep us all happy. I thought the little plastic bag as a "prize" was a bit disappointing (and rather smelly!). But it was friendly and seemed well organised. I expect to be back next year.
Date of review: September 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: JJ Flash
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Attractive surroundings, and bit of a challenge
In full: Got a personal best, but the hill at the back of the loop is a real challenge and nearly killed me off both times we ran it! Lovely through the woods, perhaps a little under marshalled. Could definitely do with more water.
Date of review: September 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Runners Need
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013