Cirencester 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (85 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2004 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 70% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 85% | | PB potential | | 62% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 48% | | Value | | 62% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: LoopyLor
 | | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Awful Race would never do this again. In full: I ran this in 65 minutes by which time they had run out of water and goody bags etc at the finish, was punishing to us beginners. Would definitely not do this race again. Date of review: April 17, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: P Nadolski
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: As a first race for me, it was great. Great course - found the hills 'challenging' - and nice friendly atmosphere. Water station would have helped. Date of review: October 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: B1rchy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Quite fast course, the hills are not as big as expected!! Date of review: October 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: The_Dodger
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not bad...the hill that you do twice is a bit overrated. In full: The scenary was nice, the course wasn't too tough and there were plenty of runners of all types. The drwabacks were...1) no water stops which appeared to be tough on a number of newer runners 2) the distance from parking to the course and 3) the number of toilet facilities. Date of review: September 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Run Your Age
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Thoroughly enjoyable ;¬) with a moderate hill. Organisation could improve. In full: PB for me - with the satisfaction of a moderately challenging course. Good for improving runners. Organisation could improve - drinks station would be good, and there's a bottleneck on the way to the start. It's a kissing gate which only lets 1 person through at a time, a severe nuisance for supporters with pushchairs. Although I think it may have been Longstocking and Flash in the Pan lingering at the gate which contributed to the delay . . . Date of review: September 27, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Rob James
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A lovely run in the Park Date of review: September 27, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: SGQ
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice scenery and traffic free. Doing the hill twice hurts. Needs a drink station somewhere on the route. In full: I enjoyed this race, except for the hill which was quite painful on both occasions. It's a lovely park to run through and great to face very little traffic. I was gasping for a drink, but no drinks station - with it being two loops, they'd only need one to keep us all happy. I thought the little plastic bag as a "prize" was a bit disappointing (and rather smelly!). But it was friendly and seemed well organised. I expect to be back next year. Date of review: September 27, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: JJ Flash
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Attractive surroundings, and bit of a challenge In full: Got a personal best, but the hill at the back of the loop is a real challenge and nearly killed me off both times we ran it! Lovely through the woods, perhaps a little under marshalled. Could definitely do with more water. Date of review: September 27, 2004
|

| |