Wymondham 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (118 votes). | 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2005 (7 votes) | | Overall score | | 83% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 74% | | PB potential | | 74% | | Atmosphere | | 66% | | Organisation | | 83% | | Value | | 86% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 69% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Blair campbell
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely scenic 20 miles, and very very flat so excellent first race for this sort of distance and fantastic pre-marathon build up run since its not too challenging on the old legs.
Date of review: March 18, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nifty & Swifty
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organized; Nice Goody Bag
Date of review: March 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Harnser
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great day, great mementos
Date of review: March 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Crazylegs
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well-organised. Website updates on weather and course conditions were excellent.
Date of review: March 8, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Norfolk 'N' Good
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Race - Ideal Prep for FLM - many thanks WAC !!
Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Kev K
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice race, low key, lovely views
In full: Good move to delay the start by 30 minutes due to conditions, though i believe a mix-up around the staggered starts, some people missed the 10m start as this was changed twice and you needed to be in the hall to know this. Thank you to all the marshalls for standing out in the cold for so long.
Didn't like the 8 or 9 90 degree corners plus one 180 in the
last 1/2 mile or so, didnt ehlp for a sprint finish (i think i'm being a little picky here though)
I shall watch out for this one next year
Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent race, organisation like clockwork, enthusiastic marshalling, picturesque scenery, offering PB possibilities! Will be back next year!
Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
