Wymondham 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (118 votes). | 1 to 10 of 33 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture 2010 (33 votes) | | Overall score | | 85% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 79% | | PB potential | | 75% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 76% | | Value | | 73% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 71% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Roy Moir
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, friendly event.
Date of review: March 16, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: martin dunne 3
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised race but goody bag was hideous.
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Thomas Lincoln-kemp
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great race - well organised, and great countryside, with a some unexpected hills for Norfolk.
Date of review: March 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: bluebuffalo
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: March 12, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Nicola Read 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well-organised run through villages. Marshalls were friendly, helpful and encouraging.
Date of review: March 12, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: mandy fulton
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: Enjoyed this race as was running around the course with friends.BUT,was very disapointed with the carrier bag at the finish as it didn't include a bottle of water,which wouldn't have mattered so much if there had of been tea/coffee facilities back at the clubhouse.By the time we got back after running for 4 hours,everything had been packed away.I managed to grab a packet of 3 biscuits,but it's not really on is it?Still,would like to run this race again,but will run faster next time to make sure all the tuck has not been packed away.
Date of review: March 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Jon Howe 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good flat coarse with challenging hill at the end
In full: No complaints from a running point of view, however the map was not the same as the coarse.The mile markers were not in the same place and I was told there were people searching for the finish, to meet their friends.
With this in mind and the fact my Garmin saying I ran 20.24 miles, I wonder if the coarse was accurate.
This did not at all detract from a good event on a glorious day.
Date of review: March 10, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Ian Todd 4
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very good
In full: Flat, Straightforward, well marshalled.
Hat better than another Tshirt, and nice and bright for future early morning runs.
Date of review: March 10, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Jeremy Walters 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great course, well organised, really friendly, the perfect spring marathon benchmark
Date of review: March 10, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Steve W6
| | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good route and well marshalled
In full: Good build up for the London marathon,shame about no medal,would of been nice for the one off runners
Date of review: March 10, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
