Birchwood 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (149 votes). | 1 to 10 of 29 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2005 (29 votes) | | Overall score | | 75% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 77% | | Atmosphere | | 63% | | Organisation | | 61% | | Value | | 78% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 74% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Silkman
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Overall good race. WIll do again. Sort out the water station though. It was useless. In full: Good race with PB potential. Couple of bumps at 7 and 8k on the bridges crossing the motorway below. Bottleneck at the finish was a problem but I was told it was because somebody had collapsed in the line. Can't blame the organisers for that!! It was blooming hot though. Could a cooler day be arranged next year please!! An earlier start than 10.30 for a race in August might not be a bad idea. Biggest problem was the water station. Wouldn't normally bother with water for a 10k but it was very hot. Picked up a cup off the table and it was empty. Found they were all like that and was then told to hold on while they pour me one! Complete farce!! That needs sorting for next year. Other people were complaining of the same afterwards. Date of review: September 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tammo
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: very good set up. Was my first race and enjoyed the experience, will do again no doubt. Date of review: August 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: APK
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: couple of small "bumps" otherwise a fast course Date of review: August 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ymh
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good flat race, nice finish and towel. In full: Problems at the finish, however well worth doing. A big field, 939 finishers, makes it a good race for every level. Will do it next year and i'm sure the slight problems will be sorted out. Date of review: August 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mike Turner
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: hot but fast In full: A good, flat course well marshalled, spoiled only by the bottleneck at the end. This needs to be addressed! Date of review: August 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: jolguk
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The finish and the weather weren't ideal, but generally a lovely race In full: The first half was very boring, but helpfully flat, and I loved the latter part of the course (my friend said she felt the hills helped break it up !), especially the 200 and 400m markers. It was bad having to wait so long for a drink after finishing, but I got a PB in spite of the heat and the late hills, and will definitely return. Date of review: August 23, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mitch Too
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised, great finish straight. The second time I've done Birchwood and I still like it. Date of review: August 23, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Contraflow
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good location and facilities. Enthusiastic marshalls. Enjoyable run. In full: Good location for start with plenty of parking and a cafe for the family to go to while they waited for me to return. Course was on mostly quiet roads and for the most part flat, just a couple of hills near the end. Didn't stop for water as there was a queue and had to stand in line for about 1 minute at the end before I crossed the line. My official time was way over what I clocked on my watch. Overall, really enjoyed it. Only my second 10K and I got a PB. Date of review: August 22, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: faulsfart
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good course, piss poor organosation In full: Potential for an excellent event but need to sort out signage; what/where is the silver birch, where is the start/finish, where are the showers. Multiple funnels are a great way to speed up the finish if you have sufficient marshalls to cover them all. No good having one set moving from funnel to funnel and the last thing runners want to do once they have finished is "move down". More water would have been helpful or to be more precise more cup fillers at the finish. Sorry if this sounds very negative but the potential is so good it would be a shame to waste what is a really good fast race. I WILL BE BACK next year Date of review: August 22, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Chris Page 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Not as flat as promised overall good atmosphere and enjoyable In full: Unusual to queue at the finish line while baking in the sun and being desperate for a pee. But I didn't care as I got the PB! Date of review: August 22, 2005
|

| |