Marlow Half Marathon  Here's how RW members rated this race (427 votes). | 1 to 10 of 32 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture 2004 (32 votes) | | Overall score | | 83% | | How many would do it again? | | 92% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 81% | | PB potential | | 39% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 82% | | Value | | 81% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 59% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Super Simmo
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Starts with a climb for the first mile and has a very steep hill at around the 8 mile mark. Lots of downhill stretches as well including the last mile. Did get a PB during this race which I was quite surprised about.
Date of review: September 18, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: DickMeister
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A killer to run in the rain with a head cold! Ouch!!
Date of review: March 10, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Terrain and weather made this one of the most challenging half marathons - will be back next year!
Date of review: February 16, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Fiona Hopwood 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Delighted to conquer those hills so successfully!!
Date of review: February 8, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Ironman_sam
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hilly but very beautiful. Well orgnized
Date of review: December 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Dread Velcro
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: an enjoyable run with some challenging hills
Date of review: December 16, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Keith Wilson 3
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely but hilly
Date of review: December 16, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A tough route but could be worse - glad it's in November rather than the summer!
Date of review: November 14, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Sandy bruce 3
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I improved my time from last year by 5 min and achieved a PB
Date of review: November 9, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: KD
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat bit? What flat bit? Well there was one or two...
Date of review: November 9, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
