Coastal Half-Marathon, Portsmouth  Here's how RW members rated this race (182 votes). | 1 to 10 of 47 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
| The big picture 2011 (47 votes) | | Overall score | | 81% | | How many would do it again? | | 80% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 74% | | PB potential | | 65% | | Atmosphere | | 71% | | Organisation | | 74% | | Value | | 81% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 74% |
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: kaskajohn
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great event, nice varied route, good T-shirt, gels at water stations and a snack afterwards.
Date of review: January 5, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: sam saunderson
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: on target for a pb and then got lost!
In full: Not enough Marshall's and got really lost had to ask for directions and I live in Portsmouth. This really frustrated me as was doing so well, I nearly quit but did decide to continue even tho I ran over 27 miles. Lots of people got lost so an improvement needed. Fueling stations were great with plenty of food and drink and very motivating which I needed! When I did finish I was offered an extra large t shirt obviously I'm not that big as I run so that was abit disappointing. I'm also still waiting for a reply from my email that I sent over two weeks ago. This was a great race until I got lost at 19 miles still really frustrated by this as was so determined to get a pb
Date of review: January 2, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Tom French 3
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good race with great scenery, a good mix of terrain and potential for a fast PB,
Date of review: December 29, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: kayleigh nias
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Jelly Beans!
In full: Lovely day, lovely race, lovely runners!
The only downside was that by my Garmin the race was slightly too long, maybe by .3 miles, although not much it does make a difference when you might beat your PB by a minute or two.
Also half way back there is potential to get lost as a few tracks you can take, maybe a few more signs or ribbons would have helped?
Loved the tramps pumping the music under the bridge at mile 6 haha they should have won the wine!
Date of review: December 23, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Duncan Meadus
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised varied terrain race.
Date of review: December 21, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: mr immune
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very good event, a few tweaks and would be excellent.
In full: A couple of extra marshalls along the course to ensure correct route is taken would make all the difference. Very good value and goodies at the end, including tea and bacon buttie.
Date of review: December 20, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Barry Orr 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fine as a race - shame about the marshalling and race directions
In full: Decent race, and some nice coastal views along the path, but there could have been improvements. At the start, I got my timing chip successfully at the race centre, warmed up, and then was chatting with some fellow runners to await the start. But suddenly: off! Usually, you get a pre race briefing, a countdown, and then a horn blast to start, but all these were AWOL. Maybe I was just too far back in the pack to hear them, but then other people I was with heard nothing either.
The coastal path is very narrow in places, which lead to a lot of bottlenecking. Also some narrow gates to pass through at times, and a very odd climb up a steep hill by side of a river: you had to wriggle through trees uphill in a stopped queue of your fellow runners, and climb over the fence to get to the main road. Not marshalled this bit at all, and if you hadn't been following other runners, you wouldn't know where to go or what to do. Def bit of an oversight on organiser's part. Glad other people have echoed my thoughts about marshalling and directions - I got lost and disorientated at one point as well, and wondered if I'd done the right route exactly. Definitely would have helped if there had been some more on the course to help.
Perhaps linked to this: was it just me, or were there a few mile markers missing along the way? (which I was timing my progress by, so that hurt!). Stolen by local scallies? Chances of a PB then were not looking too promising, and I didn't get it.
Some good points though: good water stops, nice reception at the end finishing, good medal, scrummy vegan friendly energy/protein bars at the finish (which i was pleased about: I'm vegan, and races don't usually cater too well for it), and the best race t-shirt I've yet seen. Lovingly made, and one you'd be proud to wear at the gym a few days later.
However, just when race may have redemmed itself a little at the end: no showers!!! Not just this race I've got this barney with, to be fair. I'm getting a mite fed up with race organisers everywhere generally ignoring this. If you're travelling many miles sometimes for a race, you can't always jump in the shower at home that afternoon! I'd wait half an hour for one after the race if need be, but provide them. Please!
(I did find some nearby with some effort in the end, but had to pay extra. Really, no "spirit of Xmas" generosity, or "season of good will" from local leisure centre staff, for some hot water...)
Might do this again, but I can think of other better races I've done. If you're local though, probably worth a shot.
Date of review: December 20, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: another_steve
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice flat trail run around Langstone Harbour and back
In full: Lovely weather and very friendly people made this a great event. Could be tough in wind and rain though.
Date of review: December 20, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Arjay
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pleasant race, but needs tweaking
In full: Many positives: Good race HQ close to the start, friendly race, reasonable course with a lot of variety, good value for money, regular and well stocked water stations, fair amount of support.
There are other points needing attention. The marshaling was non existent for long periods. If someone had come along and removed an arrow the whole race could have fallen apart. There was no marshal policing the bank towards the canal, which was positively dangerous.
This is not a PB course as there are too many slow sections and obstacles - adding about 10 minutes to a tarmac run.
Date of review: December 20, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Mark Beevor
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Delightful winter marathon
In full: Very enjoyable marathon.
A few improvements on marshals and directions needed for next year - one part where everyone I knew took the wrong turn.
Lovely scenery and location. Terrain makes it tough for PB but still fairly fast with zero hills to disrupt pace. We got lucky with the weather this year but a bit of rain/wind/ice shouldn't be enough to put off a marathon runner!
Date of review: December 20, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
