Esher Church School 10 KMHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (82 votes). | 1 to 6 of 6 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2012 (6 votes) | | Overall score | | 93% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 77% | | PB potential | | 67% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 77% | | Value | | 97% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 93% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Jean Parkinson
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A friendly well organised event
In full: A great course, mainly off road through the local woods and tracks - good fun in the mud. Loads of friendly encouraging marshals.
Date of review: May 13, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Mark Coxhead 3
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellent event - very well organised.
In full: This must be one of the best 10km races in Surrey. There is something about the friendly atmosphere.
There were plenty of marshalls in the woods and the distance markers (in km) were accurately positioned. The only area of improvement was the final half mile along Milbourne Lane. It was not clear where you were meant to cross the road, and the finish was too clustered with cars and children.
With this is mind, perhaps the course could be redesigned so that you finish on the green by the Swan public house and add an extra half mile in the woods.
Date of review: May 8, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Rob Willingham
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: beautiful woodland and track course (a bit muddy!). Very well marshalled
Date of review: May 7, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Toucs
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Nice run around Claygate common
In full: Very low key local event. Marshals good. Nice run with a bit of road at the start and finish. For £10, good value. There were nearly thirty from our running club, so it was good to see so many happy faces.
Date of review: May 7, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Caroline_Watson
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: The most friendly run I've done - lovely course, mainly off road. Roads it touched were quiet.
Date of review: May 7, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Happychap
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely run
In full: This a lovely low key event. Marshals were fab, the run is scenic and properly multi-terrain. Enjoyed it immensely.
Date of review: May 7, 2012
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
