Larking Gowen City of Norwich Half Marathon  Here's how RW members rated this race (267 votes). | 1 to 10 of 78 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| The big picture 2009 (78 votes) | | Overall score | | 85% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 70% | | PB potential | | 73% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 77% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 82% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: runningmumto3
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
Date of review: February 28, 2011
|
2009 race reviewed by: Kirsteen Grahn
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great first half marathon for a beginner!
Date of review: December 10, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Gemma Sullivan
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I join in every year
In full: Brilliant run very cold and wet a bit of a challenge but fantastic fun, good medal at the finish line.
Date of review: October 5, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Little Red Runner
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race but would prefer a single lap course
In full: Great organisation extended to stopping the heavy rain just before the start. A lovely course but with very few (and very quiet) spectators. Personally I would much prefer a one lap race as I dislike running over the same ground twice. Would be nice to try a city centre half in Norwich as the city is really lovely (might be more spectators too).
Date of review: January 24, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mickmannock
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
Date of review: January 23, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Jon Wiles
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race, enjoyed it even though the rain had made everything very wet!
Date of review: January 23, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ed Proffitt
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A Grand Morning Out!!!
In full: When I saw the weather at 9.30 I thought, Oh no, third year in a row of wet icy rain, fortunately the rain stopped the sun came out and there was a double rainbow! The improved weather really improved the event, great atmosphere on the day, liked the new route. If I had to have one gripe there seemed an unecessary queue at the end to hand back your chip/ pick up your goody bag. All in all thought well done CONAC/Larking Gowen!
One final thought, are Larking sponsoring this next year? As I understood it they were signed up for 3 years and this was the third year!!
Date of review: December 26, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Michelle Mcneight
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: really good! easy to park! and most importantly lots of toilets!
Date of review: December 13, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Steve W6
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: New route much quicker, 10 mins off PB
Date of review: December 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Simon JT Smith
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Change in the course is definately an improvement!
In full: This was my third time doing this event and I think the slight change in the route is a definite improvement as I hated that hill back into the Showground which has not been replaced by a more gentle incline through Easton College.
Weather this year was much better, rain stopped and the sun came out just before the start so it made for a much more enjoyable run. Good crowd as usual and decent goody bag at the end - nice not to just have a load of leaflets stuffed in a plastic bag.
Date of review: December 7, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
