Hoylake 10K Coastal Fun RunHere's how RW members rated this race (58 votes). | 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2010 (7 votes) | | Overall score | | 97% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 89% | | PB potential | | 77% | | Atmosphere | | 86% | | Organisation | | 89% | | Value | | 97% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 94% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Fiona Hanik
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fun and friendly race for all abilities
In full: There was a fabulous atmosphere from both fellow runners and supporters. Windy day but the view made up for it. Well done to all the Run In England runners, for most of them it was their first 10k.
Date of review: September 23, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: MikeC
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Windy
In full: Well organised race with a friendly atmosphere and excellent scenery. My first time but wpuld do again
Date of review: September 14, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Haggis
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyable, friendly race. Wind made things interesting on the return!
Date of review: September 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Creekyheel
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fantastic course and atmosphere
In full: This is a lovely course along the Wirral coast, with all of the route off road. The weather is key to chances of a PB here: this year there was a strong headwind after the turn for home which came as a shock to most.
The race is in a good cause and those with GPS will consider this probably the world's greatest 9.7K!
Date of review: September 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: hamrag
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Spot on
In full: Well organised, nice flat course with a bit of off road thrown in. 10k PB couldn't ask for more...
Date of review: September 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Doberman
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: excellent race and value for money
In full: hope lots of money was raised,thanks to all volunteers, marshals and the spectators at the start/finish,head on wind on the turn around made this a - grit your teeth - return 5k run
Well done everyone
Date of review: September 12, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Slowfoot Going Goofy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great race
In full: This race has it all well organised a flat course with a decent chance of a PB. A run along the Mersey waterfront together with part of the Wirral Way. A good mix of abilites which welcomes first timers and those looking to push the pace. The marshals and staff are very supportive and a goody bag tshirt and certificate all for £8 outstanding value. The best organised and most welcoming run on Merseyside
Date of review: September 12, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
