Woodstock 12  Here's how RW members rated this race (79 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2004 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 85% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 88% | | PB potential | | 55% | | Atmosphere | | 83% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: 354
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The views around Blenheim Park alone is worth the visit!
Date of review: February 2, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Dr Scrote
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Friendly, scenic & good value
Date of review: November 26, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: stanley Thornton
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Could do with a bit better organisation and not so mean with the medal
Date of review: September 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: gail warren
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Was a hard run but as a beginner i felt intimidated
Date of review: September 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Beebeep
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Our 1st time -F.A.B. day out. Great Atmosphere and even the sheep were running along. Coombe Hill was tougher by the 3rd time around though.
In full: This was only my 2nd race after Sheff 1/2Marathon. Di & I thought that this was luvly setting {saw deer on training runs the week before. Everyone was friendly though small {230 runners}field was primarily made up of fit clubbers. Thanks to Mike Shipway & team for the Org. Will def. look out for this next yr. Henley to come on Oct 10th -See you there !!
Date of review: September 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: pussywussy
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great fun but pretty tough on those uphill stretches
Date of review: September 20, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Squarehead
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: a
Date of review: September 20, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Pipes
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very well organised and beautiful run (but difficult, especially if you're feeling unwell!)
Date of review: September 18, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
