Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Matthew Walker 10k xmas pud race   Enter this event online.

Here's how RW members rated this race (140 votes).

1 to 10 of 12 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2004 (12 votes)
Overall score
 
80%
How many would do it again?
 
100%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
62%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
70%
Organisation
 
82%
Value
 
78%
Beginner-friendliness
 
68%
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: Petehouse
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Quite undulating and parts are off road, great xmas pudding!
Date of review: July 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Laura Boultby
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good fun despite the cold and quite liked charging through the mud. The pud makes a change from t-shirts!
Date of review: November 30, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Tenacious Fox
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great atmosphere and a good mixture of novices and experts. Whilst waiting in the neverending queue for the ladies was warned about the last hill, but in fact found it less painful than those at the beginning!
In full: Very impressed by by the vegetarian xmas pud at the end
Date of review: November 23, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Notty
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Nice one - many thanks to the encouraging marshalls.
In full: The hills are not that steep but seemed very long to an ageing plodder like me. The country lane and trail bits were the best, despite the mud. The worst bit was queuing for the ladies. The pudding looks good, and even appears to be vegan - an unexpected bonus from a personal point of view!!
Date of review: November 22, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Bbhsb
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: A little hilly, muddy, lots of pot holes, great marshals. Great pud.
In full: My first ever 10k. I didn't think the club itself was over friendly; seemed very cliquey. The marshals were friendly though and very encouraging, thanks guys. To someone who comes from a flat area of the country I did find it a bit hilly, although not as bad as I thought it would be. The mud was the killer, and not much fun for me anyway. I will be prepared for it next year. And a word to the organisers. Make sure there are plenty of ladies toilets available at the start next year. Many missed the start because of the queues for the loos.
Date of review: November 22, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Tude
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: From road to a school cross country.
In full: Great organisation and support from marshalls. Muddier and more potholed than expected, but finishing gave a warm glow feeling because of it.
Date of review: November 22, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: hammerite
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Nice run out. Good excuse to get up on a Sunday morning!! Like the idea of the pud too.
Date of review: November 21, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: bunts
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Nice little workout
In full: Friendly race - marshalling was excellent and suprised at the amount of support for a cold morning, the course itself is mostly flat (i'm still scarred from Bestwood!).
Very muddy through the park but that's half the fun surely!
Date of review: November 21, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: "plodder"
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: very friendly,and undulating run.Good sunday morning run!
In full: Very welcoming race just the right size, Everyine was extreemly friendly good mix of road and park although rather muddey in places well worth the trip though and despite the cold managed a p.b.
Date of review: November 21, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Fiona77
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Very friendly & well organised but very muddy!
In full: Very enjoyable race, marshalls friendly & helpful and organisation excellent. Very muddy and potholed in places, warning of this beforehand would have been nice but still a great race & pud much appreciated.
Date of review: November 21, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013