Kingston 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (50 votes). | 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2012 (7 votes) | | Overall score | | 91% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 86% | | PB potential | | 83% | | Atmosphere | | 71% | | Organisation | | 89% | | Value | | 74% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 86% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Louisa Buchanan
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: My favourite event so far!
In full: Fantastic race- very well organised. Everyone kept warm in the club before the race and then out for a 5 min warm up. Perfect number of runners, great route along the river and then finishing with a medal and chocolate bars- brilliant!
Date of review: December 13, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Martin Powell 7
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: very good event for first timer
Date of review: December 3, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Jonathan Abel
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organized, friendly race with enthusiastic marshalls. A quick course - flat with hardly any undulation although 2-3k on towpath was quite uneven. Will be back again next year.
Date of review: December 2, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: tobyhouse
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: as others have said this is a well organised race in a nice location,will run again in 2013
Date of review: December 2, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Tim Andrews 5
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, lovely route, great weather and ideal for a pb. Will definitely do it again,
Date of review: December 2, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Brian O'Farrell
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Easy and well run race
In full: Good communication before the race, results up quickly after the race. Nice warm up beforehand and plenty of marshals on the route. Only gripe would be that I measured it as 10.20km but still closed strongly.
Date of review: December 2, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Nic Penny
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great run in a beautiful location.
Date of review: December 2, 2012
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
