Crowborough 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (101 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2003 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 70% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 58% | | PB potential | | 37% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 72% | | Value | | 70% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
|
|
2003 race reviewed by: Longlegs
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 2 Laps, tough, tough, tough hills Date of review: October 31, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Andrew Stiles 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A well organised race with excellent marshalling. Credit to Crowborough Runners and the Lions! Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Worm
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A 10k with two one-km hills. Challenging. Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: paul Rawlinson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: paul Rawlinson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Bakaman
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Really tough hill that you have to run up twice but the support around the course from spectators was great. Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Murderous long hill which got steeper and you had to negotiate it twice!!!! Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |