Bromley 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (58 votes). | 1 to 10 of 31 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture 2011 (31 votes) | | Overall score | | 47% | | How many would do it again? | | 42% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 50% | | PB potential | | 77% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 38% | | Value | | 54% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 63% |
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: Andrew McCleery
 | | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: |
Date of review: January 15, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Peter Talbot 3
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: running around a park for a tenner!
Date of review: January 14, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Brian Robinson 9
| | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: |
Date of review: December 5, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Stephen Gregg 2
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poor course set up with all corners being cut and multiple loops
In full: Starting on running track there was no attempt to send runners round inside then outside of the track, rather to all go round different distances to overtake in outside lanes etc. The park was fine but as the number of cones were limited it appeared all runners were cutting the corners of the park particulerly at the top where significant distance was saved by some. Stewards on positions were encouraging and friendly but just needs a rethink in terms of the course. Stretching and use of the health club a good bonus and T-shirt and medal also good. Would have prefered a better medal however.
Date of review: September 21, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: John McElroy
| | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: |
Date of review: July 5, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Gazza81
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poorly organised and short!
Date of review: March 30, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: ed gyde
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: organisation v poor; and dull race
Date of review: January 18, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: rupert mcleod
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: My dog and my children. If you don't like running in a public park then you know what to do.
Date of review: January 18, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Nick Stone 3
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: January 18, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Steve Taggart
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: the first time I have had to be given instructions about the course on the start line.
Date of review: January 18, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
