Ultrafit St Annes 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (36 votes). | 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2012 (4 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 75% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 90% | | PB potential | | 90% | | Atmosphere | | 65% | | Organisation | | 65% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: DoctorK
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Usual good, well organised race.
In full: The weather can be unpredictable at this time of year so as i've mentioned before in review I always carry some fluid with me knowing there is only one water stop. Last year it was cold so didn't need it but this year quite warm, anyway there was plenty water at 5 miles if you needed more.
As usual well organised and marshalled with plenty of encouragement too, thanks
Date of review: March 19, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: The Egyptian Toe
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: To the windmill `n` back!
In full: It is a shame that the base is at the fire station a fair old hike from the start and also that there`s the double lap of the car park to begin the race but, when you`ve got to grips with those facts, it`s a really nice race!
This year the weather was glorious meaning quite a few specatators to add to the numerous marshalls lining the course. A fair mix of runners and a decent shot at a PB if you could get in a group on the second half of the race with a headwind to contend with.
No medal or t-shirt but a bargain fee with a sweet-toothed goody bag and lots to refuel on at the end of the race, unless you`ve `walked off the course`!
Date of review: March 18, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: AF_MURPHY
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Water water everywhere, but not enough to drink!
In full: Unfortunately run on probably hottest day of the year. Couldn't survive on half a cup of water. Gave up after nine miles and walked off the route. Won't be back - unless it's for a picnic! :)
Date of review: March 18, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Dirty Leeds Rob
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice fast course - ideal for 10 mile virgin or those seeking a PB
Date of review: March 18, 2012
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
