Clumber 10kHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (80 votes). | 1 to 10 of 18 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2008 (18 votes) | | Overall score | | 63% | | How many would do it again? | | 78% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 87% | | PB potential | | 71% | | Atmosphere | | 53% | | Organisation | | 30% | | Value | | 39% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 62% |
|
|
2008 race reviewed by: Wizzard Woo
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice mix of woods and roads, great finishing straight.
Date of review: November 2, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: mike stockton
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyed the actual run but let down by organisation
In full: first race for 3 years. Enjoyed the race itself, other runners very friendly. Glad I got there early so no problems with getting chip and number, but annoyed at having to wait 15 mins extra in que at start. For the cost would have saved a lot of messing and time if chips sent out prior to race. T-shirt was a little disappointing. Apart from that had a good day met some nice people.
Date of review: October 2, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: dog runner
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Same comments as other people as to the organisation. The run was good though
Date of review: September 30, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: richard mackie 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Such a shame about the run up to the start.
In full: Predictable chaos before the start - I hate to knock organisers / volunteers but the handing out of numbers / chips was a debacle.
Once off it's such a good run. Pleasantly undulating and great scenery. The kids love it.
Date of review: September 29, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: littlelawyer
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Let down again by poor organisation...
In full: Last year this was my first ever 10k, so I was looking forward to it again despite feeling woefuly underprepared.
I have to say I don't understand why race numbers and chips weren't sent out, especially when it was £14 to enter. It's not as if the chips were bulky and couldn't be posted. Luckily I got there early enough not to have to queue, but I can understand the frustration of people who had to queue twice.
The race itself was really nice, scenery lovely as always, and I enjoyed it, despite not managing a PB.
Date of review: September 29, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Stevie P
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Same as most other peoples comments really.
In full: Just one point, I thought Worksop Harriers organised the event this year as opposed to the National Trust so was expecting the organisation to be much smoother....if you are going to have over 1000 runners turn up for a race you need about 10 lines of queues, not 4!
Date of review: September 29, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Chris Dutton 2
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Lacked organisation & Support
In full: Yes it was a shambles at the start but not all down to the organisers as they warned racers that there would be queues for race numbers and that. So why didn’t people get there earlier???
A bit tight at the start but ok once you got going, though could of done with keeping the supporters out of the way!
Poor t-shirt as you can hardly see the insignia its that small but overall a good course and certainly a PB breaker but with better organisation it could be a very good race!
Date of review: September 29, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: pig plods
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: don't let these organise anything bigger..... SHAMBLES
In full: I concurr with everything said about the start of the race and I would like to add:
1.Why when we had a relative in a wheelchair with a blue badge did they FORCE us into the parking field despite asking 3 times to goto the disabled. Anyone ever tried pushing 22 stone in a wheelchair in a very muddy field for 1/2 a mile ???
2.I thought the point of chipped races was the chip started at the start line and gave an accurate time. Is it me or is the 1 1/2 minutes extra on my time, compared to my own stopwatch started at the line, likely to be the time queing to get to the start line
3.COMPLETE lack of facilities. A very small cafe that couldn't cope and not enough toilets too far away from start. Ever heard of portaloos and tea vans?
Date of review: September 29, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Elly Thornton
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: It was good but there are improvements needed
In full: The course was very nice and overall I really enjoyed this event but there are some improvements that could be made (and having read the 2007 reviews a lot of those suggestions have been taken on board).
1) Toilets closer to the start line
2) post numbers and chips out prior to the event
OR
3) Have a better queuing system with more people handing out numbers
4) Either more water stations or have bottles of water at halfway
5) As mentioned elsewhere - a date on the t-shirt would be nice
And a personal preference would be to have competitors only on the line-up to the start and supporters at the side.
Overall I had fun though!
Date of review: September 28, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: snowski
| | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Total shambles & a total rip off.
In full: For the cash this was a disgrace. 1000 runners stood about in the rain whilst the numbers shambles was sorted out was a joke. Done runs with 1000,s runners & never seen anything like this. A terrific venue totally ruined by no organisation. No toilets for runners & a poor t-shirt. Shame on you charging so much. Do the Worksop half instead to see the scenery & how to organise an event.
Date of review: September 28, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
