Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Frimley Park 10K

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (133 votes).

1 to 10 of 13 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2006 (13 votes)
Overall score
 
66%
How many would do it again?
 
81%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
45%
PB potential
 
70%
Atmosphere
 
57%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
77%
Beginner-friendliness
 
72%
Or view by year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
All years
 

2006 race reviewed by: Simon Harvey 3
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: My first race and almost on my door step so comments probably not too representative.
Date of review: March 31, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Amanda Benstead 2
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: The collapse of the inflatable finish said it all
In full: They were unable to start the clock on time but did not tell anyone at the finish so people would have gone home thinking they had done a PB when in fact their actual time was 4 minutes slower. I only found out because a friend of my won a prize so we stayed for the prize giving otherwise I would have been blissfully unaware.
Date of review: March 28, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Simon Tarry 2
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Quite hilly. Time keeping issues (finish clock 3mins slow). Poor start organisation.
In full: Thanks to all the marshalls and organisers - an enjoyable race, hope you raised some good funds.
Date of review: March 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Are we there yet
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Quite challenging - but good fun for a Sunday morning
In full: I agree there were a couple of administration problems but I;m sure they will sort them out for next year. Great run, really friendly and the hills weren't too bad!
Date of review: March 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: john needell
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: My first 10k and worth doing, some hills and no problems with cars in this town race
Date of review: March 26, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Miki Jacobs
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: biggest complaint was that roads were not closed at all. Selfish car drivers cutting across runners to get into places! Difficult to hear announcements and no clear signage for fun runners to r
Date of review: March 26, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Popper
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: A great way to get those trainers out after a dreary winter
Date of review: March 26, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: anna wright
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: some suprise hills but the downhill made up for it
Date of review: March 26, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Andreas Oehlert
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A nice race raising money for a good cause - crowded start
In full: well done all the volunteers - thank you!the only fly in the ointment was the time keeping of the race clock and the distance between the km-markers. it was about 5-6min faster than my HR monitor (started at the sound of that horn. good parking and a small enough race for beginners as well as the more aspirational racer.
Date of review: March 26, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Seela
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Reasonably well organised, but poor marshalling in places and where were the finish timekeepers?
In full: Friendly race but and adequate number of marshals (thanks for your efforts) BUT
The fun runners were indistinguishable from the other runners so the ONLY marshal at the split failed to direct all the fun runners down the correct turning as he could not see which were which. Further more there was no noticeable signs for the runners warning them of the split. I saw 2 young runners coming back against the field because they had gone wrong, and two more at about the 4k point talking to marshals and race officials.
The fun run was supposed to be only 2.5 k and these children were going to do at least 8k if they went straight back.

There were not any finish time keepers, so I don’t expect there will be any results. In addition to that the finish clock had not been started until the race was underway so it was approximately 3 minutes slow.

I would expect a ‘race’ to produce results. In my view a ‘fun run’ may get away without it.

Sorry if I seem negative but as a runner of 18 years, and a race organiser myself I don’t think these are acceptable short comings.
e indistinguishable from the
Date of review: March 26, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013