Garstang 10k  Here's how RW members rated this race (76 votes). | 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2005 (7 votes) | | Overall score | | 69% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 69% | | PB potential | | 69% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 71% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 69% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mike Whyatt
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Take the kids for the fun run!
Date of review: December 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tornado Trainers
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Would do this again
Date of review: January 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised and friendly. Start needs better signage.
Date of review: January 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: DJ08
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A scenic way to start the new year. The start could be improved with a simple 'Start' flag / line to avoid the late set off and need to be bunched back. Overall: very enjoyable
Date of review: January 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ctg
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short:
Date of review: January 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Richard Broadbent
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good, well organised race and nice to see a fun run for those that did not fancy the 10k
Date of review: January 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Wiz
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good race overall
In full: Second year I've done this and second year with everyone lining up before being told to move back. A simple sign with 'START'on it would remove the necessity for this shuffling.
Above a tiny complaint as otherwise race well organised.
Date of review: January 9, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
