SiS Longleat 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (439 votes). | 1 to 10 of 35 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture 2005 (35 votes) | | Overall score | | 86% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 90% | | PB potential | | 45% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 81% | | Value | | 71% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 68% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Rob Campbell 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Gret race Date of review: December 6, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mill T
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough hills but great scenery Date of review: January 31, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Bonesy
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Not a pb course, but the setting is lovely. In full: Hill at the start, repeated at around 7k is hard going and to have 3 sizeable hills in a 10k is demanding, but a great race and the long downhill to the house is magic. Although I walked the 3rd hill, it would not put me off doing it again with a little more preparation. Medal is good. Date of review: May 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Steve Parham
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic course, all lanes. Superb finish at Longleat House Date of review: March 23, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: DaveWylie76
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: All that is good in a race...others take note.. In full: 209 events have done a great job from literature, maps, champion chips, location and course !
Despite freezing fog, a long trip from surrey and a few hills it was a good fun event for all. Id o think trading standards may take exception to use of "undulating" though !
Will do more 209 events races (and prehaps they could take on a few Runners World races too !!)
Would be a great place to do a half marathon....?
See you soon 209 at Woburn Abbey... Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mav42
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: One word - hilly! In full: Will know next year to train for those hills! Yes it was enjoyable enough to go back again. Date of review: February 11, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: VO2 Max
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: +Well organised, scenic, good turnout -expensive, too few loos, nothing open for spectators on arrival Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Hilly
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Tough, but a lovely scenic course! Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: top banana
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hilly but scenic - Poor goody bag for £12 entry fee Date of review: February 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Sam P @ BS3
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I would put it in the "Hilly" catergory as opposed to the "Undulating"! Certainly felt the aches and pains the following day ! Date of review: February 9, 2005
|

| |