SiS Longleat 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (439 votes). | 1 to 10 of 82 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| The big picture 2006 (82 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 92% | | PB potential | | 47% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 73% | | Value | | 65% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 68% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: andybrook
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great race a couple of steep hills but great to finish
Date of review: December 23, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Mikey Moo
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hilly but great
In full: Run in on last 1k was fantastic, downhill with Longleat House at the end.
Date of review: July 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: capetraveller
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A great run, hilly but with beautiful scenery & well organised.
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: drinker with running problem
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: tougher than I thought, but i gotta do it next year!
In full: Good run, more challenging than i expected, but now i know, i'm up for next year. could have done with more toilets....but then that's the same for most races! entry fee was a bit high, but it's chipped and the organisation wasn't bad - liked the maps, etc provided when you got your number through. see you all next year...i'm hill training already!!
Date of review: February 16, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Robert Triggs
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A beautiful first 10k of the year - wonderful scenery and well organised. Will be back next year!
Date of review: February 16, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: terry ward 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: VERY ENJOYABLE FOR MY FIRST 10KM RACE
Date of review: February 11, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Melanie Cowdrey
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: An excellent way to spend a Sunday morning!!
Date of review: February 10, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Graham Broom
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very very very tough third hill !!!!!!!!
In full: so this is undulating ? dont fancy a hilly run then! Incredible queus for the changing facilities near the start (or were they the toilets ?). Apart from that a great race and will definitely do it again!
Date of review: February 10, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: B Rubble
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hills, we ran up them, we ran down them!
In full: Phew, quite tough. I was very slow on the last hill but my significant momentum carried me down the hill to the end. Poor toilet facilities, could also have done with showers at the end. Having said that good atmosphere and organisation, fantastic setting, great finish.
Date of review: February 10, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Frank Armstrong
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyed it, will go back for more. Everyone should try this one.
In full: Ran a pb of 47.05. Good with k markers to judge your pace. At least you knew what the last 3k was going to be like after the first loop. Could have had more toilots.
Date of review: February 7, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
