Bramley 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (260 votes). | 1 to 10 of 55 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| The big picture 2005 (55 votes) | | Overall score | | 86% | | How many would do it again? | | 96% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 73% | | PB potential | | 74% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 90% | | Value | | 79% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 72% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Waveydavey
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A well organised race, through pleasant countryside that is ideally placed as a London warm-up. Date of review: March 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by:
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great warm up race for a spring marathon that isn't overpriced and has a realistic maximum entry that can be catered for. Reading Half take note! Date of review: March 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Peter Moss
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Excellant event well run showed how it should be done! Date of review: March 20, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: DickMeister
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First 20 miler - second lap hurts!! Date of review: March 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: urz
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good organisation as usual In full: Very smooth organisation. Enjoyed it this year. Only improvement would be more water stations and bigger cups - I lost most of mine picking it up so was v thirsty during the 2nd lap.
Date of review: March 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: martin smith 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very quick race, well organised. Would be more interesting if 20 miler was a one lap course. One of mile markers at wrong distance a bit disconserting!! Date of review: March 8, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Trinity_
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race...took 5 minutes off my 20 mile PB Date of review: February 26, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Shaper
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: One of the best races around. In full: Superb race. Extremely well-organised. Friendly marshalls. Everything worked very well. Very cold but had 6 cups (large ones) of tea, and some nice cake. Also a PB Date of review: February 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Dweezil
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised, great (cold) day In full: Hats off to the marshalls, and the drinks and mile markers were excellent. The pen was a bit of a disappointment but I wasn't here for the trinkets, and the atmosphere and relatively good value make up for any deficiencies in the baddy bag Date of review: February 24, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: BigBob
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well Organised, but very cold In full: An excellent race, with very tough marshals. The goody bag leaves something to be desired, however a big pb for me was just reward!! Date of review: February 23, 2005
|

| |