Fred Hughes 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (382 votes). | 1 to 10 of 11 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2005 (11 votes) | | Overall score | | 87% | | How many would do it again? | | 95% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 69% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 62% | | Organisation | | 84% | | Value | | 78% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 75% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: MudBlood
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My first 10K for a long time. Very enjoyable and good route. In full: The start was my only concern where we were all squeezed into a quite a narrow part. But apart from this the route was excellent. Some good hills too with the wind against us! Date of review: May 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Colette Cooper
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice route with some challenging hills but some nice long down hills as well. Got PB so I'm happy! Date of review: May 8, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Little Nemo - waving, not drowning!
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great 10 mile race - ideal for first-timers In full: Nice and rural, very friendly and not too challenging. Lots of support along the way so good for us plodders at the back. Lovely showers as well. Date of review: February 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Brooks the beast
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Flat early season run. Fairly scenic given no leaves on the trees In full: This should be a PB course. Never worked out that way for me until this year. The weather was ideal though. Well organised and marshalled, can be tight for parking space Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Dooj
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, flat Date of review: February 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Pintsize
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: fast and well-run Date of review: January 31, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: RichardW
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I never realised how flat it was! I kept thinking that a hill was bound to appear...but it never did. Date of review: January 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Ronnie Wibbley
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good flat course, well-organised and friendly. Date of review: January 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Charles Howard
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat, fast, scenic and well organised. Date of review: January 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: LucyEgg
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good race, well organised, interesting course Date of review: January 30, 2005
|

| |