Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Fred Hughes 10

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (382 votes).

1 to 10 of 18 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2012 (18 votes)
Overall score
 
73%
How many would do it again?
 
89%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
69%
PB potential
 
62%
Atmosphere
 
61%
Organisation
 
70%
Value
 
73%
Beginner-friendliness
 
59%
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2012 race reviewed by: LS
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: solid race good field well marshalled - hard to find fault with.
Date of review: February 3, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: SilkTork
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Pleasant enough but less than ordinary
In full: I enjoyed the run. The weather was good, and the course went through countryside - not spectacular countryside, but decent countryside nevertheless. I enjoyed the course. Indeed, I would recommend it. That is not to say that the race was anything special, but it was pleasant, and provided you don't have much in the way of expectations, then it does the job nicely. An early morning run in January, through decent countryside over a challenging but not aggressive course, with plenty of friendly marshals. And, as it's held in St Albans, there's the opportunity for a decent pub crawl afterwards.

I didn't use the suggested car park. I parked in a sidestreet near the start/finish point. As I wanted the loo before the start, I did go to the race HQ, and noted that there were plenty of parking spaces available. There was no loo paper, but this is not uncommon, and experienced runners should bring their own.

The start was a little messy. People seemed unsure where they needed to be, but - again - having been to a number of such low key club runs, one learns to expect this. I didn't notice any signs pointing to the start, but I had read the fairly decent instructions beforehand, and there were enough runners heading in the right direction to guide the way.

There were at least two water stops (the same one actually), which consisted of water cups, and I did notice some jelly babies, but too late to grab any!

At the loop end the organisers had the returning runners crossing over in front of the outgoing runners, which seemed clumsy. Why not have the outgoing loop turn left, so there is no crossover? Also, the marshals, while pleasant, could be a little more alert in giving directions. They are sometimes poorly placed, and more than once I had to ask which direction. Indeed, at the loop crossover, one marshal was blocking the way I had to go, and only moved aside when I was asking which was the way I had to go. It helps if marshals point the way as soon as they see a runner coming.

No goodies, water or bananas at the end. Often goodies are donated by sponsors - it's just a question of the club being proactive. The medal was decent quality, but not individual. If you're an experienced runner you'll already have it, with some other race name scratched on the back. For ordinary club runs like this, I'm not fussed about medals anyway. I'd rather have some sports drink and nibbles. Or a hat or a t-shirt, or a sweat band. Something a little different, perhaps.

All in all, pleasant enough, but rather less than ordinary. I'd do it again, but it's not a favourite race.
Date of review: January 29, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: RichardW
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Well organised and enjoyable
In full: I had a bad run last year, should've pulled out after 2 miles, so I was apprehensive this year. In the end, I improved by 30 minutes and I only walked up a couple of the late hills. Great organisation and well marshalled.
Date of review: January 28, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: Popo
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: nothing bad but nothing too exciting either.
In full: Fairly predictable "club" race. Nice enough course and very well marshaled. The start was chaotic with marshals shouting at runners to get off the road and the HQ as quite a hike from the actual start/finish area and an even further trek from the recommended parking. Would do it again purely because it's a rare event - not that many 10 milers around and not that many races in January in the area.
Date of review: January 24, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: Drewseph
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: A good tough 10 miler to start the year
In full: I didn't like the start as it was very congested and they should consider closing the road for 10 minutes, otherwise a good challenging 10 miler. Well organised and marshaled.
Date of review: January 24, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: a.k.a "billy"
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Half decent 10 miler
In full: I enjoyed my first attempt on this version of the Fred Hughes 10. Having run several of these races on the old course at the old venue I knew that the Striders work hard on their events.
This was evident in the pre race info sheet advising about all the important matters like parking, baggage and distance to the start from the HQ.
Signage at the HQ was also plentiful so toilets and changing could be found easily.
The course and route was good in my opinion except for the first/last 300 metres which were fairly rough tarmac pavement. The rest of the course I enjoyed on decent country lanes with the odd moderate incline. Not quite as quick as the old course in my opinion but on the whole I believe this route is better.

Date of review: January 24, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: Bri Boy
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Defines "Undulating" - good fun and just the right time after Xmas
In full: Good fun this one, the route is undulating, covering 3 different loops that all end up back at the same pub. Nice to run on lanes rather than pavements. The hills kick in after mile 5. The start / finish was a bit further from HQ than I was expecting - it might be an idea to remind people to leave the hall 20 mins before the start in the future. Will certainly do it next year.
Date of review: January 23, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: runlozrun
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Just tough enough
In full: Good parking facilities. Organisers were very encouraging almost to the point that you want to join their running club. Nice course with just enough hills and nice medal to finish. The long hill at mile 6 deserves a special mention.
Date of review: January 23, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: Silver Fox 2
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Never dull and clears away the cobwebs
Date of review: January 23, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

2012 race reviewed by: Josh Hand 2
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%

In short: Pretty, undulating course. Very friendly marshalls.
In full: An excellent race - one I'd definitely do again.

Hallam - the Race Director - was immensely helpful at looking after my bag (with medical supplies in).
Date of review: January 23, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013