Sidcup 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (102 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2005 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 68% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 45% | | PB potential | | 90% | | Atmosphere | | 52% | | Organisation | | 70% | | Value | | 75% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 58% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Julie Gardner 3
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: enjoyed race, medal would of been nice
Date of review: February 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: redordead
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: running in a residential area not necessarily ideal but was OK. Lack of clock at finish line was a disappointment!
Date of review: February 20, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Simon Coughlin
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, fairly flat course.
In full: Well done Kent ac. First time I had done this event. Found it well organised and the marshalls were superb.
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: PeteB
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good local race, well marshalled, would do again
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Warwick Bilham
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very friendly marshals
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: PieNapper
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Fast well organised race
In full: Well Organised with great marshalling, an inexpensive race, and good for a PB.
Scenery is pretty dull though, needed my mp3 player!
Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nina Williams
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: got a PB and met some friendly runners on route, encouraging marshals too
Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: CraigB
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent budget ten miler
In full: The course is 3 pretty flat laps of sidcup which is never going to be scenic...Well organised with excellent marshalling....
No momento or race clock at the end, but it is dirt cheap to enter so no compaints here
Date of review: February 13, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
