Sheffield Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (528 votes). | 1 to 10 of 13 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2003 (13 votes) | | Overall score | | 65% | | How many would do it again? | | 96% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 54% | | PB potential | | 51% | | Atmosphere | | 66% | | Organisation | | 68% | | Value | | 69% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 72% |
|
|
2003 race reviewed by: Mickey Rooney
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Soft spot for this event. Really enjoyable
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Shaun Wright
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Great city centre race, a few good undulations and an olympic style stadium finish, fantastic.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Ann Tanker
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I'll only do it again because it is my local race. the finish in the best athletics stadium in the country is great for visitors. It was a new and slightly more interesting route this year going through part of the city centre great for vivistors
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Ann Tanker
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I'll only do it again because it is my local race. the finish in the best athletics stadium in the country is great for visitors. It was a new and slightly more interesting route this year going through part of the city centre great for vivistors
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Simon O'Rourke
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Don valley remains a great place to finish.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Grumpy Old Man
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Sad runner
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: colin crampton
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good start and finish srea very good crowds
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Brian Bennett
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 20% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Not enough water stations
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: XYZ
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Far better organised than given credit for.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
