Sheffield Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (529 votes). | 1 to 9 of 9 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2004 (9 votes) | | Overall score | | 73% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 58% | | PB potential | | 67% | | Atmosphere | | 78% | | Organisation | | 84% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 90% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Stephen Stewart
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I have to like it, I live here
Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: JoSc
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellent race, well organised, great atmosphere.
Date of review: September 21, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: The Pillock In Combats
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: A few more Mile markers would have helped with keeping a steady pace throughout the race
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Sad runner
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: stephen ducey
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Dippy Dino
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Lots of crowds on a traffic free suburban route. Niggle was that it felt like we ran round the stadium 5 times before actually getting inside it - not what you need when you're dying on your feet!
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: ARH
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Great start\finish area in Don Valley Stadium, good city centre race, good crowds
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: andrew matheson
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: not enough goody bags as my wife finished in 2.30 and got told their was none left but kids got two or three each for the fun run as pepole in the ring side was saying
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: john norris 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Ran out of goody bags before 2 hours. Not good! Nice medal though.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
