MudManHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (1 vote). | 1 to 1 of 1 rating | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (1 vote) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Julian Teece
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: This was my first trail run -Brutal. This was harder than the Royal Parks Half marathon!!! Very pleased/suprised with the time as there were so many full on hills that I ended up walking up over half of them (training in Greenwich park is flat in comparision). Having said that I really enjoyed the challenge of the technical running on different surfaces,avoiding freezing puddles/super sticky mud and navigating different widths/types of paths all through a beautiful forest. Absolutely knackered at the end but big, big buzz.
Date of review: December 8, 2012
|
| 
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
