Asics Watford Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (878 votes). | 1 to 10 of 15 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2004 (15 votes) | | Overall score | | 72% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 72% | | PB potential | | 49% | | Atmosphere | | 64% | | Organisation | | 75% | | Value | | 68% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 66% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: stuart underwood
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: All this and you get a free t-shirt Date of review: June 19, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Space
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Some tough hills but enough for everyone. Good race to get into the new year Date of review: January 20, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Heathward
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Better than average In full: A varied enough mix of hills and terrain to keep the mind interested and the eye amused. The organization and atmosphere was good as always. I will certainly be runnign this event in '05. Date of review: December 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Some tough hills makes this a challenging race. Date of review: November 30, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Daisymoo
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Scenic, crazy hills, usually bad weather. Fun. In full: Practically impossible to run consistent splits. Date of review: November 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Ronnie Wibbley
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A good workout with some challenging climbs. Date of review: September 4, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Wobbly Jogger
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hills were hard for a first timer ! Date of review: August 27, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Brooks the beast
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Well Organised, Scenic especially for a winter run. Big field with good spread of runners Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Man In Black
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Big Roy's Dad
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Good organisers, who listen to constructive comments rather than being defensive - hence it gets better Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |