Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Asics Watford Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (878 votes).

1 to 10 of 15 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2004 (15 votes)
Overall score
 
72%
How many would do it again?
 
97%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
72%
PB potential
 
49%
Atmosphere
 
64%
Organisation
 
75%
Value
 
68%
Beginner-friendliness
 
66%
Or view by year
2013
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: stuart underwood
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: All this and you get a free t-shirt
Date of review: June 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Space
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Some tough hills but enough for everyone. Good race to get into the new year
Date of review: January 20, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Heathward
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Better than average
In full: A varied enough mix of hills and terrain to keep the mind interested and the eye amused. The organization and atmosphere was good as always. I will certainly be runnign this event in '05.
Date of review: December 17, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Some tough hills makes this a challenging race.
Date of review: November 30, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Daisymoo
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Scenic, crazy hills, usually bad weather. Fun.
In full: Practically impossible to run consistent splits.
Date of review: November 17, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Ronnie Wibbley
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: A good workout with some challenging climbs.
Date of review: September 4, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Wobbly Jogger
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Hills were hard for a first timer !
Date of review: August 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Brooks the beast
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%

In short: Well Organised, Scenic especially for a winter run. Big field with good spread of runners
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Man In Black
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
40%

Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Big Roy's Dad
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%

In short: Good organisers, who listen to constructive comments rather than being defensive - hence it gets better
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013