Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Asics Watford Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (878 votes).

1 to 10 of 15 ratingsPage: 1  2  

The big picture 2004 (15 votes)
Overall score
 
72%
How many would do it again?
 
97%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
72%
PB potential
 
49%
Atmosphere
 
64%
Organisation
 
75%
Value
 
68%
Beginner-friendliness
 
66%
Or view by year
2013
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: stuart underwood
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: All this and you get a free t-shirt
Date of review: June 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Space
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Some tough hills but enough for everyone. Good race to get into the new year
Date of review: January 20, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Heathward
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Better than average
In full: A varied enough mix of hills and terrain to keep the mind interested and the eye amused. The organization and atmosphere was good as always. I will certainly be runnign this event in '05.
Date of review: December 17, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Some tough hills makes this a challenging race.
Date of review: November 30, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Daisymoo
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Scenic, crazy hills, usually bad weather. Fun.
In full: Practically impossible to run consistent splits.
Date of review: November 17, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Ronnie Wibbley
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: A good workout with some challenging climbs.
Date of review: September 4, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Wobbly Jogger
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Hills were hard for a first timer !
Date of review: August 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Brooks the beast
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%

In short: Well Organised, Scenic especially for a winter run. Big field with good spread of runners
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Man In Black
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
40%

Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Big Roy's Dad
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%

In short: Good organisers, who listen to constructive comments rather than being defensive - hence it gets better
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Millet Sports
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013