Asics Watford Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (878 votes). | 1 to 10 of 61 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| The big picture 2005 (61 votes) | | Overall score | | 77% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 70% | | PB potential | | 53% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 76% | | Value | | 73% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 61% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Spencer Cox
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Challenging In full: Done this in a PB of 1.37 yet no record of this on the official site? I emailed Watford Harriors but had no response ever which i thought was very slack.A very hard race,hilly in parts and very rural but was good for preparation for FLM. Date of review: December 30, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: SMJ
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A challenge because of the hills. Ideal as part of London Marathon build-up. Date of review: May 31, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jonathan Cramp
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fair half marathon course In full: For those running from SA, nice easy course......hills just right to be a tester. Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Lizzie Jordan 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Hills are a killer. Not good if you are a novice Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Darren Ling
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: good race, got a pb so job done In full: the hills made the course inteesting, not to sure about the third water station, and also tasted like there was poinon in with the sponges. Organisation at the end was shambolic but the race and marshals were really good. Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Sneddy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great event. Thoroughly enjoyed it, and sent a PB !! Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: blackadder
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: pre & post race organisation needs attention. Date of review: February 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nemesis
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good London Marathon training Date of review: February 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Hazel Clark
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Did manage a PB but not all together a comfortable run In full: More senic than you would expect and the hills made a good challenge, I found the final loop in that park really demoralising though. Date of review: February 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Battersea Trudger
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: This was my first race at this distance, and thoroughly enjoyed the whole event, apart from a couple of those hills. Date of review: February 9, 2005
|

| |