Run Richmond Park 10KHere's how RW members rated this race (16 votes). | 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2010 (4 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 85% | | PB potential | | 75% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 75% | | Value | | 70% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: mark lee 21
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: October 2, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Gemma Tiley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Beautiful setting, well organised, nice route
Date of review: May 10, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: AllyF
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great scenery, hills to challenge, friendly marshalls
In full: Friendly and laid back, but all the organisation worked. Couldn't always hear the instructions at the start but that didn't cause any difficulties. Course is 2x Richmond Parkrun but starting at Sheen Gate so an uphill start. Marshalls were really encouraging and friendly, healthy banana at the end. Got a PB even with the hills so I'm happy
Date of review: May 8, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Alex 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In full: I think the timings were inaccurate - or my watch is dodgy - the online timings added 1 min and 9 secs. Also, some of the km markers did not seem to be correctly placed - the distnace between 1km and 2km very short, and between 3km and 4km was very long - did others think so? Otherwise well organised and friendly
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
